- Background of the Case
- A Show Cause Notice (SCN)No.………………………….dated ….September 2023 was issued by the Sales Tax Officer, proposing a GST demand of Rs. …………/-CGST and Rs. …………/- SGST, along with interest and applicable penalties.
- The allegation is based on the observation that the Noticee earned Interest Income, classified as exempt from tax, but failed to reverse Input Tax Credit (ITC) proportionate to this exempt income as required under Rule 42of the CGST Rules.
- Noticee’s Response and Submissions
The Noticee disputes the allegations on the following grounds:
- Interest Income is Exempt but Excluded for ITC Reversal Purposes
- Under Section 17(2)of the CGST Act, ITC is restricted to taxable supplies, and any ITC attributable to exempt supplies is disallowed.
- However, Clause (b) of Explanation 1 of Rule 43, introduced via Notification No. 55/2017-Central Tax dated 15 November 2017and Notification No. 70/2017 – Central Tax dated 21st December, 2017, explicitly excludes interest income from the definition of exempt supplies for ITC reversal purposes.
- This exclusion applies unless the taxpayer is a banking company, financial institution, or NBFC engaged in accepting deposits or providing loans/advances.
- Non-Applicability of Rule 42 to Interest Income
- Though Interest Income is categorized as exempt under GST, it is not considered exempt for the purpose of ITC reversal as per Rule 42 and Rule 43.
- Consequently, ITC on expenses related to earning interest income need not be reversed.
- Conclusion and Request
- The demand of Rs. ………………/- proposed in the SCN dated ……. September 2023 is legally unsustainable and should be set aside.
- The Noticee requests the concerned authority to drop the proceedings in light of the above explanations.
For help related to GST, ITR, or any other legal services, visit us at www.companymitra.com.